Deiseb a wrthodwyd Requisition the release of seized articles that we need to use for the 20mph petitions & campaign
The Manual of procedure in the public buisness provides for "greivance over privilege" claims, to enforce privileges for petitions. We the electors require the restoration of evidence held here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxAJNxpbJFO6lQHvwH3g3wA
We want access to this evidence for the 20mph petitions being prepared in connection with petition 245548
The Electoral Commission have "take down notice" power.
So similar can be done using
The Parliamentary papers act for a restoration order
Rhagor o fanylion
In the Parliamentary Journals p1270 for 8th June 1837, privileges & parliamentary papers, that all articles, evidence & any documents connected to petitions are protected by privilege
Here in the Sir Gilbert Campion edition of Erskine May's Parliamentary Practice. At p.130
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.50071/page/n185/mode/2up Under misconduct against petitioners, it is a contempt to seize, obstruct, hinder or interfere with petitioners and their evidence, articles or mesne civil process, therefore the YouTube channel is illegally seized currently a contempt against us according to the public petitions section of the parliamentary practice book.
(Government publication)
In paper HC 235 in the oral evidence for e-petitions. I quote Q107 "That is right, therefore they are using this right and that is completely privileged under the bill of rights"
The American "section 230" CDA act 1996 is not British law & does not allow constitutionally protected articles to be removed
Pam gwrthodwyd y ddeiseb hon?
Mae’n ymwneud â rhywbeth nad yw’r Senedd na Llywodraeth Cymru yn gyfrifol amdano.
Dim ond deisebau nad ydynt yn bodloni’r safonau ar gyfer deisebau y byddwn yn eu gwrthod
Mae deisebau a wrthodwyd yn cael eu cyhoeddi yn yr iaith y cawsant eu cyflwyno ynddi